Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renewal by Andersen Corporation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Andersen Corporation. Kubigula (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Renewal by Andersen Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Corporation is a subsidiary of Andersen Corporation, its content is about the parent company. Fails WP:GNG Gsingh (talk) 04:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This, weirdly, could almost qualify as an A7 given that there is no assertion of significance about the actual subject of the article (the only assertion of significance is for Andersen Corporation). None of the sourcing supplied represents significant coverage of this corporate subsidiary, and the subject matter is already well-covered in the Andersen Corporation article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 05:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Andersen Corporation, no merging. It looks like someone copied the content but never redirected it. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect a separate article is unnecessary & the content is already there. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.