Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayoori (actress)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Improper nomination and intent to withdraw nom. —fetch·comms 22:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mayoori (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is referenced; it is possible to find out more. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:26, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article does not fall under biographies of living persons. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article is well-referenced, and isn't a BLP since the subject is dead. Peter Karlsen (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It does have (reliable enough) sources, altought very short article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep due to improper good faith nomination. With respects to the nominator, WP:BLP does not apply to persons who are deceased, and the aricle IS sourced. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There, I think i'm done fixing up the article. That's all the refs I could find at least. Oh, and I echo Schmidt's wording. SilverserenC 17:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WOW! Very nice work! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article will be kept because now it has everything a biography of a living needs. Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.